Friday, May 30, 2008

Friday quiz: Name the voting rights crusader

Which champion of voting rights said the following yesterday?

I'm disappointed at the lengths people will go to disenfranchise voters and to win at any cost.
  • Al Gore, recalling voting irregularities in Florida in 2000
  • John Kerry, recalling voting problems in Ohio in 2004
  • Hillary Clinton, complaining about the plight of primary voters in Michigan and Florida
Would you believe Jim Ogonowski? That's right, a Republican is concerned about the disenfranchisement of voters. Of course, he's worried about opponents disqualifying his voters. But still, it's refreshing to see a Republican in favor of growing the voter pool. I'm looking forward to his fervent support of same-day voter registration, mail-in voting, and strong opposition to identification requirements.

Heh.

Tags:

Edited to correct the spelling of "Ogonowski."

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Knuuttila's stormy Tuesday

The line of thunderstorms that descended on the North County yesterday wasn’t the only ill wind blowing. Heavy weather also has engulfed the campaign for the senate seat being vacated by Bob Antonioni, as charges of broken promises, double-dealing, and confidentiality breaches have begun to swirl.

The basic question is this: Did Brian Knuuttila tell Jennifer Flanagan that he was dropping out of the race, only to renege a couple of days later, or did the Flanagan campaign publicize a private conversation between the candidates to try to force Knuuttila out of the race? And why was Knuuttila so evasive when asked about the meeting?

At least three stories have been published in the Telegram and the Sentinel over the last 24 hours and by piecing the three together, we might be able to come to some sort of a comprehensive narrative. First, the Telegram posted the following update on its web site yesterday afternoon:

Brian A. Knuuttila said this morning he will make today's 5 p.m. deadline to file nomination papers for the Worcester and Middlesex state Senate seat.

Mr. Knuuttila, a former state representative who lives in Gardner, said a glitch with signatures obtained in Townsend delayed his filing.

He said the Townsend issue has been resolved and the signatures certified.

The delay in filing might have led to speculation that he would drop out of the race, Mr. Knuuttila said, but he vowed he's in it to stay.
Now I’m not the most tapped in observer in the North County but I think I am better informed on local races than most, and I hadn’t heard one whisper that Knuuttila might be jumping out. Where might that sort of speculation come from? Let’s go into the Sentinel’s coverage in this morning’s paper for a clue:

BOSTON -- Former state Rep. Brian Knuuttila had everyone guessing over the weekend about whether he would continue his campaign for Senate after telling his opponent he was prepared to call it quits.

Knuuttila, of Gardner, turned in his nominations papers Tuesday to the Secretary of State to campaign for retiring Sen. Robert Antonioni's seat, but not before he told both Antonioni and state Rep. Jennifer Flanagan on Friday that he planned to bow out Both he and Flanagan are competing for the Democratic nomination to replace Antonioni in the Worcester and Middlesex County state Senate seat...

Antonioni said Knuuttila asked for the weekend to notify his supporters, and tentatively planned an announcement for Tuesday morning at Antonioni's Leominster district office.
If this account is correct, the “speculation” mentioned in the Telegram story is probably a cryptic way of saying that the press had been told to be ready to head to Leominster on Tuesday for Knuuttila’s withdrawal. The press had been tipped off, everyone has settled in for a nice holiday weekend, and then, according to the Sentinel’s account, Knuuttila changes his mind:

...On Saturday night, Knuuttila called Antonioni to tell him he was reconsidering. Knuuttila told the retiring Senator he now believed he had been given bad information about how much money Flanagan had already raised for her campaign and thought he could compete.

With renewed confidence, Knuuttila told Antonioni he was still trying to make up his mind.

"The whole thing just sounded very different. It had all been decided until he called me that night," Antonioni said.
So whoever tipped off the press (and it must have been someone involved with either the Flanagan campaign or Antonioni’s office, my money is on the Senator) has to call the reporters back, tell them that there is no withdrawal announcement after all, and then starts spilling the beans about the meeting. In both the Sentinel account and the follow-up in today’s Telegram, the accounts from Flanagan and Antonioni are remarkably consistent. Each contains the following claims:

  • Knuuttila was looking to get out because he couldn’t raise enough money to compete

  • He wanted to mend fences between Flanagan and Sheriff Guy Glodis

  • He might be moving to Florida in the fall

  • He gave Flanagan a hug and told her she would be a “great senator”
If all of that is true (and let’s be clear, these versions of the story are based on discussions the newspapers had with Flanagan and Antonioni), it makes a pretty convincing case that Knuuttila’s heart isn’t really in it. But I haven’t seen any indication that Knuuttila’s enthusiasm is waning. On the contrary, I’ve seen him out on the stump a handful of times and he looks like he is working his tail off, and enjoying himself to boot. The man was standing alone outside the Sterling Town Meeting a couple of weeks ago holding a sign and waving to voters. Not what I’d expect from someone who was getting out.

(Even so, the mental images that go along with the accounts in the paper can’t be good for Brian. If this were a high-profile, nasty campaign, a mass mailer with Knuuttila in a Disney hat with a cold drink in one hand and a speech bubble with the caption “Jenn Flanagan will make a great senator” inside would probably be forthcoming. But I don’t think it would ever come to that.)

Knuuttila didn’t help himself when he tried to deny to the Telegram that the meeting never took place. He probably figured that what happens in Gardner stays in Gardner, and when the Telegram confronted him with the story of the meeting, he was caught completely off guard:

Yesterday, Mr. Knuuttila initially denied that he even met with Mr. Antonioni and Ms. Flanagan on Friday, and said he had no idea how any rumor that he was leaving the race might have gotten started.

“No” he said when asked by a reporter, “Didn’t you meet with them?”

After an interruption during a telephone interview, he then said, “I apologize. There was a discussion,” and he acknowledged that, in fact, he had met with the Ms Flanagan and Mr. Antonioni….

At one point yesterday, Mr. Knuuttila said he had not even, at any point, considering dropping out of the race. “No, I did not have second thoughts about running last week,” he said. At that time he attributed what he called “rumors” about his dropping out to “some desperation tactic on the part of people supporting my opponent.”

Later, however, after being told of Ms. Flanagan’s and Mr. Antonioni’s account of the meeting, Mr. Knuuttila acknowledged that he did meet and talk with them about concerns he had that Ms. Flanagan might outspend him many times over and that he might find that campaign funding advantage “insurmountable.”

“We told them if that fiscal information was correct, things looked pretty bleak for us,” Mr. Knuuttila said of the conversation at the meeting.

“We didn’t come out and say we were formally out of the race. We didn’t come out and say that … It was never actually said. I was looking at it very seriously based on the information we had, because of the huge margins,” Mr. Knuuttila said last night.

“I did not say I was dropping out of the race. There was a misunderstanding and I don’t know what to say more about that misunderstanding,” he said.
It seems pretty clear to me that Knuuttila didn’t expect to get that phone call. He absolutely made a pigs’ breakfast out of his explanation. By the time the Sentinel got to him, he had honed his response:
"We had a short conversation about keeping the race positive. We had heard she had been raising a significant amount of money and we had to face the possibility of her outspending us seven to one,"

Knuuttila said. "I said let me sit on this awhile. I never made a commitment. This was all supposed to [be] kept in confidence."
Which is what he should have said in the first place.

So what does all of this mean? Ultimately, I don’t think it will mean that much to voters. I doubt many of them are paying much attention this early in the process. The first debate of the campaign won’t be held for another four weeks (shameless plug: June 23 at 6:30 pm at the First Church in Sterling, hosted by the Sterling Democratic Town Committee), and while this issue might come up, I don’t think too many voters are that interested in this kind of inside baseball. And it certainly won’t be an issue come September.

Where it may hurt Knuuttila is in the wallet. If he wants to be able to compete financially, he needs to start raising money and this sort of story can only hurt. He claims to be afraid he might be outspent seven-to-one, and it seems like the worst way to keep the money flowing is to signal to donors that your heart might not really be there. No one wants to give money to someone who doesn’t think he can win. (Check out Save Fitchburg for another take on the race and a more detailed breakdown of what a “seven-to-one” money edge might look like.)

I hope Knuuttila is in it until the end. The district deserves a spirited race with candidates who hold divergent views on many issues, so that the voters have a clear choice. Filling an open seat with an unopposed candidate would not be the best thing for the district.

Who knows, perhaps this little kerfuffle might make for a more lively campaign, or at least fewer hugs between the candidates.

Tags:

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

$4.05

I've read plenty about it, Ive heard about it, but seeing it for my own eyes is still startling. For the first time, I've seen regular unleaded gas listed above $4.00. I passed this full-service station in Berlin on the way home from work this afternoon.

400gas

Tags:

Not "Wheezy"...WEEZIE!



Every so often someone will toss a comment into a post I did months or years ago. Of all the posts that I've written, the gift that keeps on giving more than any other is the one I wrote two Decembers ago about my quest to pick up Christmas Cards I ordered from Wal Mart

In it, I use the nicknames "Slacker McSkaterdude" and "Master Shaggy" in referenfcing a long-haired, multiply pierced, photo clerk and refer to his manager as Louise Jefferson because of her resemblance of the late, great Isabel Sanford.

Earlier this morning, a commenter named "Kam" didn't get the joke:
There is no need to judge someone on their hair, piercings and only what I can assume could be weight with the comment of "wheezing". How pathetic is that? It makes me want to stereotype you as an old religious nut who judges those who have some sort of individuality.
No, you see I didn't say the manager was wheezing or wheezy, I called her "Weezie" as in "George and Weezie." You know, George Jefferson's affectionate nickname for his wife, Louise?

I'm not sure how anything I've written could cause one to stereotype me as a religious nut, but I suppose using TV characters from the late 70s is enought to stereotype me as old...

Tags:

Monday, May 26, 2008

Memorial Day Weekend

Pictures (mostly of Jackson) from Memorial Day weekend...

memorial day 010
Veterans marching in the Sterling parade.

memorial day 008
Jackson marched along the sidewalk as the band passed.

memorial day 013
Michelle teaching Jackson about the colors of the flag.

latemay 004
Playing in the "jumpy thing" at his cousin's birthday party.

latemay 023
Looking through the porthole.


Enjoying strawberry shortcake at a pool party.

memorial day 017
Giving his buddy Rowan a hug.

latemay 045
Snuggling with Summer.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Michael Graham’s unwavering support for Veteran candidates

As I’m sure he did in 2000 and 2004, Michael Graham takes on those who would oppose a Vietnam veteran’s campaign for president this morning in a post titled "We Support The Troops...Unless They Run For President." Among the excerpts:

Berkeley liberals attack a Marine recruiting office and even try to cast spells on it. Cambridge shuts down a Boy Scout drive collecting gifts to send to soldiers in Iraq. Harvard chased the ROTC off campus during the Vietnam War and still won't allow them back.

But whatever you do...don't question the Left's patriotism!
It’s always nice to see a right-winger support the candidacy of a Vietnam veteran. One of the hallmarks of conservatism in the 21st Century is its unwavering support of presidential candidates who fought overseas...

Now, I wasn’t a listener of Graham’s back in 2004 (OK, I’m not now either; you got me), and I wasn’t reading his columns or blogs or whatever he might have been writing then. But I imagine that if I was I’d have found this:

We Support The Troops...Unless They Run For President.

Georgia conservatives attack a triple-amputee Vietnam War hero and tie him to Osama bin Laden. Conservative religious leaders preach that God sent the 9/11 attackers to punish America. Thousands of delegates to the Republican convention sport purple band-aids to mock the war wounds of a decorated war hero.

But whatever you do...don't question the Right's patriotism!
I’m sure I’ll find that link in the archives somewhere. Just got to keep looking...

Tags:

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Sal DiMasi: Government by Decree

So, the whole thing about needing a special election should Senator Kennedy resign...House Speaker Sal DiMasi says "never mind":

BOSTON — The leader of the Massachusetts House says he will support giving Gov. Deval Patrick the power to appoint an interim successor to U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy if that becomes necessary.

The Democratic-controlled Legislature stripped Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of that authority in 2004 because of fears he would name a Republican to replace U.S. Sen. John Kerry if he had been elected president.

Instead, state law now requires a special election for the seat no sooner than 145 days and no later than 160 days after the vacancy occurs.

But House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi said yesterday if Kennedy should step aside or have to be replaced because of his brain tumor diagnosis, he'd be in favor of a gubernatorial appointment.

"That was a good political reason (then)," DiMasi said of taking the power away from Romney. "It's a good political reason to change it back."

No, Mr. Speaker, bald-faced politics was not a good reason then, and would not be a good reason now. If one wants to argue that the law needed to be changed in 2004 because it was a bad law, I can get behind that (although I don't think it was necessarily a bad law). But to suggest that the old law was bad because the governor was a Republican, but now that the governor is a Democrat it was a good idea after all...no.

It seems to me that if the legislature changes the law each time it suits the Speaker or his party (in this case, my party) our government ceases to be a government of laws, but rather government by decree.

Tags:

Media missing the fine print on possible Kennedy succession

In every article I've read about the procedure to replace Senator Kennedy should he choose to retire because of his illness, the law regarding succession has pointed to a special election between 145 and 160 days after the resignation is announced. Here is this morning's Globe, for example:
The law says a special election would be held 145 to 160 days after either a vacancy is created or a senator declares he or she is vacating the seat. It specifically bars a temporary appointee until voters can choose a replacement.
That is what the law says, but it also says something else, which I have not seen reported anywhere:
If a vacancy for senator is created after April 10 of an even-numbered year, but on or before the seventieth day preceding the regular state primary, the precepts shall appoint the day of the regular state primary and the biennial state election for holding the special primary and special election required by this section.
In other words, if Senator Kennedy were to announce his retirement on or before July 8 (the seventieth day before the September primary) the special election would be placed on the November 4 ballot along with the other races, including the presidential race and the contest for John Kerry's seat. In that case, a special primary would be held on September 16 along with the regularly scheduled primary.

This is in no way to suggest that Senator Kennedy should or will announce a retirement early this summer. I hope along with the everyone else in Massachusetts that Senator Kennedy makes a full recovery. But if the Senator believes that his prognosis is bleak, the timing of a possible decision to retire becomes very important, as the prospect of another election this summer looms.

Tags:

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Sad News

About 1:30 this afternoon, I came across the news bulletin that Senator Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. It is very sad news. Not that I'm sitting at my desk weeping, but the critical illness or death of one of the icons of your youth changes your perspective and has left me feeling a little hollow. A little piece of the world as I've known it appears to be irrevocably changed.

(I felt the same way when Ronald Reagan died. While I was no supporter of his, he was the first president who I was really aware of, and his death left me feeling that a little tie to my life growing up was gone.)

I've known three people who have suffered brain cancer and the two who developed it as adults suffered terribly before succumbing to the disease (the one who survived his fight was diagnosed and treated as a child). Based on what I have read this afternoon, the fact that the cancer was not discovered until after it had begun causing seizures is not good news at all.

Hopefully Senator Kennedy will make a full recovery and return to continue his work as one of the most accomplished Senators the nation has known.

UPDATED: Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia broke down this afternoon when speaking about Senator Kennedy:



Tags:

Flanagan kicks off her campaign in style

Last night, I attended the official kickoff for State Rep. Jennifer Flanagan’s campaign for state senate. (News coverage is here and here.)

Flanagan’s event last night was very much a corporate affair. The event was held at the Sheraton Conference Center in Leominster, which has the only real business-class meeting facilities in the North County. Most of the men were in jackets and/or ties and many of the women were in business attire as well. The cash bar was open and the waitresses were circulating with toasted raviolis and stuffed mushrooms and all of the other standard hors d’oeuvres you’d find at a wedding reception or a business meet-and-greet. There were a number of important political figures there to lend support, including members of the Leominster city council, Fitchburg Mayor Lisa Wong, retiring Senator Bob Antonioni, District Attorney Joe Early, Jr., and other elected officials.

Like any stereotypical political event, the candidate was preceded to the microphone by the aforementioned dignitaries. Mayor Wong spoke for a couple of minutes, noting that she knew of Flanagan and her work for the district long before she had met the Representative. The District Attorney told the crowd of Flanagan’s tenacity in working the state house to increase funding for his office so that he could hire more prosecutors. Senator Antonioni praised Flanagan for her hard work for the district and expressed confidence in her ability to continue his work for the constituents.

For her part, Flanagan seems a little uncomfortable with the praise and adulation. While a little shyness and humility can be endearing, it can also serve to dilute and discount the impact of the praise. For instance, when she took to the podium, Flanagan thanked the speakers and then gave a little more background on the stories Early and Antonioni shared. Early had mentioned that Flanagan wrote his budget request on a “pink sticky” that she then carried with her to meetings with the DA the house speaker. In Flanagan’s comments, she mentioned that the reason she had a pink sticky was because Early had called late in the morning and that’s all she had to write on. That served to make her look a little less heroic and dampen the impact of Early’s testimony.

Similarly, Flanagan recounted the call she received from Antonioni when he let her know he was retiring. She recounted that he said (and I’m paraphrasing) “This is your chance, you’re running for senate.” That discussion was probably held in the context of discussions Antonioni and Flanagan had held over a long period of time where the two had discussed their plans for the future, but the way the story was related it sounded as if Antonioni had told Flanagan what to do. Again, in an effort to be self-deprecating Flanagan had undermined herself.

(As a piece of unsolicited advice, I’d suggest Flanagan retire that anecdote, or at least stash it away when she comes to Sterling and Lancaster. At our combined Democratic Town Committee last month, the Sterling and Lancaster delegations were not entirely thrilled with Antonioni’s record in relation to the towns, to the point where a member from Lancaster suggested that Flanagan had done more for the town—despite not representing it in the house—than Antonioni had as Lancaster’s senator.)

But once Jenn got the niceties out of the way, she made a passionate and effective plea for support. She recounted discussions she had with house colleagues who tried to talk her out of leaving her house seat for a run at the senate. They told her that she had it easy in the house as one of the few members whose district included just one city, and that she was crazy to give up her seats since she had already ascended to the vice-chairmanship of a house committee in just her second term. Flanagan said that she understood what she was giving up, but that she believed that she had more to offer the region, and that she saw an opportunity to be an advocate for 110,000 more citizens than she currently represents in Leominster.

She mentioned her ties to other towns in the district, specifically mentioning that her family was originally from Sterling and that Flanagan Hill Road is named after her family. She had recounted that story when she spoke to the Democratic Town Committee last month and I wondered if it was just a little pandering, but last night’s crown was definitely a Leominster crowd—I think there may have been just two of us from Sterling—and she left it in.

I was fascinated at how different Flanagan’s kickoff event was when compared to the announcement tour staged by her opponent, Brian Knuuttila. As I recounted last month, Knuuttila’s event in Clinton was held on the steps of town hall on a dank, dreary afternoon in front of a crowd of about 20, with as many or more out-of-town supporters as Clintonians. He spoke for about 15 minutes and then took questions from a couple people in the audience. After the crowd broke up, Knuuttila and a local newspaperman and I chatted for quite a while before the candidate had to pack up. It very much had the feel of an old-time grass-roots campaign. That impression was further solidified last week when Brian was standing alone in front of the Chocksett School last Monday, greeting Sterlingites who were headed in to Town Meeting. In contrast, Flanagan’s event had all the trappings of incumbency.

One of the reasons I decided to attend Flanagan’s event was the opportunity to meet some people and network a little bit. When I worked as a college basketball coach I had a reputation of being somewhat of a schmoozer, but that quality was based on being in a position of power. It’s easy to work a room or visit with a recruit’s family when you are offering something that someone else wants (admission to college, a spot on the team, a scholarship, etc.). But I find that I have a hard time “schmoozing up.” It’s difficult for me to walk up to an elected official or business executive and strike up a conversation. Going to an event like this and being essentially alone is good because it forces me to either strike up a conversation or sit alone on the sidelines eating toasted raviolis (not that there is anything wrong with that).

I had the chance to talk to a few of the elected officials in attendance. I got to catch up with Leominster city councilor Bob Salvatelli, who I’ve known for a long time from his days as a basketball referee and my days as a coach. I talked for a few minutes with State Committeewoman and Register of Deeds Kathy Daignault about an upcoming rally that the party will be holding in Leominster. I also had a nice conversation with District Attorney Early about some of the changes he’s made at the DA's office since his election in 2006. He was telling me about his work with the Molly Bish Center and his efforts to fight against cyber-bullying and intimidation in schools. I told Early that for years the only Republican I ever voted for was whoever ran against John Conte and that I was happy to see the changes he’s made. That probably came across as a total kiss-up, but it was absolutely true.

I introduced myself to Senator Antonioni and spoke with him briefly (Antonioni has perfected the neutral introduction. When I told him who I was, he nodded and said “yes” in a way that would have sufficed if he had met me before, but was also appropriate for meeting someone for the first time. Politicians need this skill because they meet so many constituents that there is no way to remember them all, even though the constituent probably assumes that the senator would remember an encounter). After I left the event, I was kicking myself for not taking the opportunity to lobby Antonioni to support Representative Naughton’s house budget earmark for the Wekepeke when the budget goes to the joint conference committee. I’ve got to remember when I have someone’s ear not to be shy about talking into it.

My only real disappointment was not getting to meet Mayor Wong. I have followed her rise to the Mayor's office through the news and was hoping to meet and congratulate her, but she had to leave the event before the speeches were over.

Now that I have seen both candidates up close and in their element, I have a decision to make. While I have committed to remaining neutral until after the Sterling Democratic Town Committee’s candidates’ forum on June 23, I will probably jump into the water with one candidate or the other after the event. I’ve decided that I want to be involved in the campaign in some capacity; it’s just a matter of deciding how and with whom.

Photo from the Sentinel and Enterprise.

Tags:


 

No Drumlins Copyright © 2009 Premium Blogger Dashboard Designed by SAER