Last year people said Curt Schilling was fat...he’s not fat, he just has a bad body.I've been saying that about myself for years!
Tags: Fat Jim Rice Curt Schilling
Last year people said Curt Schilling was fat...he’s not fat, he just has a bad body.I've been saying that about myself for years!
Mr. Sheppard asked for a copy of Nestlé’s bid, which the selectmen agreed to provide. He also asked that a forum be planned with officials and residents from both towns.Instead of insulting we "people up there in Sterling" how about having a dialogue with us? If you want this project to go through so badly convince us why it is legal, and why it is good for the community.
Chairman Robert V. Pasquale Jr. reluctantly agreed to a forum, after urging from fellow board member Mary Rose Dickhaut.
“There’s a lot of concern over nothing,” Mr. Pasquale said. “Those people up there in Sterling have a lot of time on their hands.”
In Clinton, the organization is offering to pay the town’s current rate for untreated and undelivered water: $2.55 per 100 cubic feet. Clinton could potentially garner $200,000 to $300,000 annually based upon state mandated withdrawal volumes. Nestlé would also chip in another $200,000 for dam repairs.As previously reported, the $200,000 for dam repairs would be split with an initial payment of $100,000 and five annual payments of $20,000 to follow.
Nothing is written in stone for Sterling as of yet, but Nestlé proposed to enter into a contractual agreement with the town concerning the project and additional annual payments to be made to the Town of Sterling.
Hi Clinton and Sterling reporters --The discussion there is speculating that the proposal is for $2.55 per 100 cubic feet of water, which would bring the contract down to $280,000 per year from the reported $28 million. If that speculation is true, it changes the discussion 18o degrees. Would it be worth Clinton's trouble for an additional $280,000?
there's an article on the above paper's web site tonight which contains significant factual errors -- including an outlandish figure of 28 million. We have an executive summary of the RFP response prepared which we'll provide you on Monday. While we work at getting a correction over the weekend, we just wanted to make sure the mistake did not get repeated elsewhere.
Thank you and have a good weekend.
Nancy J. Sterling, APR
Senior Vice President, Strategic Communications ML Strategies, LLC
Nestlé, which has spent the last year expressing interest in tapping the aquifer beneath the 564-acre Wekepeke Reservation in northern Sterling, is seeking to pay Clinton $2.55 per cubic foot of water extracted. Nestlé officials had earlier proposed installing wells with maximum safe yields of 230,000 gallons per day, or approximately 11.22 million cubic feet per year — a potential payout to Clinton of $28.62 million.Let's try to put those numbers into perspective. According to Clintonmass.com, the entire fiscal year 2008 budget for the town of Clinton was a shade north of $37 million. Of that, about $14.7 million were raised in property taxes. Essentially, if Clinton chose to do so, they could stop collecting property taxes altogether and still bring in an annual surplus of $13.9 million.
Nestlé is also offering Clinton an initial, one-time payment of $100,000 for Wekepeke dam repairs, plus another $100,000 annually for ongoing maintenance, broken into five $20,000 annual installments. In addition, the company will pay Sterling $200,000 to $300,000 annually.
I call upon your office to send a ‘cease and desist’ order to the Town of Clinton Selectmen to forestall their impending violation of Ch. 14 of the Acts of 1882 and I also call upon your office to bring a Superior Court action against the Clinton Selectmen to enforce Ch. 14 of the Acts of 1882 if need be.Gittens has also drafted a legal opinion supporting the claim and has signaled his intent to bring a suit against the town of Clinton based on the 1876 and 1882 acts. Gittens and other citizens (including me) asked the Board to be a party to a potential suit to have the Acts of 1876 and 1882 interpreted. Gittens even offered to represent the town for free in the action, but the Board declined to accept his offer or support legal action.
Good Grief! This is where I lose patience with most advocacy groups. More often than not, it seems that groups like this one (and recently the anti-Wal Mart "Lancaster First") employ a kitchen sink strategy where they throw everything they can at the wall, no matter how outlandish, in hopes that they can get something to stick. When any advocacy group starts coming up with outlandish reasons to oppose a plan, they end up losing credibility and undermining what would otherwise be a noble cause. In this case, the "Concerned Citizens" list of demands are almost uniformly absurd. Let's break them down:
- That the water not be sold internationally because of a risk that international trade agreements could negate local control over the amount of water withdrawn from the reservoirs.
- That water pumping be limited to between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. weekdays, with no pumping on the weekends.
- That the company provide residents with irrevocable guarantees that if their well production is reduced by 30 percent or more, the company will replace the well.
- That the company buying water thoroughly repair the dams at Wekepeke before water extraction begins.
- That the company extracting and purchasing water give Sterling a one-time non-refundable payment of $5 million for Sterling’s agreement that the necessary permits be granted, plus 50 percent of the amount the company would pay Clinton.
HOLDEN— An 18-year-old Wachusett Regional High School student was left alone in Italy for a day to arrange her flight home after losing her passport hours before the student group’s scheduled return flight....What precluded one of the two chaperones from staying behind?
“On the night before she was to return home she lost her passport, ID, everything, in the back of a taxi,” Ms. Howe said. She said the two chaperones gave her daughter 200 euros because she also had lost her money, and that they told her daughter to go to the consulate for a replacement passport and a flight home. She was to stay in the airport until her flight, Ms. Howe said. “She was left in Italy for a day by herself.”
There were other problems with the trip as well, Mr. Pandiscio told the school board: too few chaperones and the fact that one of the chaperones did not fly all the way back to Boston with the students, but rather flew to North Carolina.So this is what it really boiled down to. There were only two chaperones and one of them was not returning to Boston with the group. So the options were to have the straying chaperone cancel the trip to North Carolina and stay in Italy, keep the entire group together in Italy an extra day so the one remaining chaperone could stay with the girl, send the other 13 kids home alone, or leave the student stranded in Italy until she could figure out how to get her passport and get home.
[Superintendent Thomas G.] Pandiscio told the school board and Ms. Howe the chaperones had copies of the passports and that he believes the student would have been allowed to fly home with the rest of the group using the copy as identification.Well, I don’t agree with the part about the chaperones not making last-minute decisions. That’s kind of why there are there. The problem is that leaving a student alone in Italy is the wrong last-minute decision.
He said the chaperones should not have been making last-minute decisions, and that the policies and procedures required them to have emergency plans and telephone numbers.
BRATTLEBORO - Voters in two southern Vermont towns passed articles Tuesday calling for the indictment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney for violating the Constitution.Maybe Bush can schedule a visit over the summer. I can't imagine Sergeant Stumblebum would have much luck getting past the Secret Service, but it would be fun to watch Brattleboro's Finest try.
More symbolic than substantive, the items sought to have police arrest Bush and Cheney if they ever visit Brattleboro or nearby Marlboro or to extradite them for prosecution elsewhere - if they're not impeached first.
In Brattleboro, the vote was 2,012 for and 1,795 against. In Marlboro, it was 43 to 25, with three abstentions....
The article read: "Shall the Selectboard instruct the Town Attorney to draft indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution, and publish said indictments for consideration by other authorities and shall it be the law of the Town of Brattleboro that the Brattleboro Police, pursuant to the above-mentioned indictments, arrest and detain George Bush and Richard Cheney in Brattleboro if they are not duly impeached, and prosecute or extradite them to other authorities that may reasonably contend to prosecute them?"
Well the reporter stopped writing for that outfit, and it now has a much better quality of information that isn’t a one sided political hack job, but factual. The writer has however, continued his fabricated, inflammatory rhetoric on a Blog and is hell-bent on furthering the political agenda’s [sic] of his associates. This comes at the cost of assassinating the characters of specific elected public officials....This selectman essentially calls Broderick a hack, a character assassin, and a liar....and he does it while posing as an anonymous, independent observer!
[W]e here at the Indy Dot Com will report the truth, not some vile Thompsonesque gonzo rabble that is just there to denigrate our elected officials for the political gain of others. The Indy will report news in black and white and perhaps even our reflections on the vigilante Bloggers [sic] latest lies…Independent indeed!
I’d like to set the record straight on the ownership of the domain name thelocalindependent.com. Yes, I do own it and have since sometime last fall. I bought this domain to rebut the incendiary and near slanderous rhetoric and name calling that was, and still is being written about myself and others on a local Blog....Talk about twisting like a pretzel! Selectman Notaro writes that he intended to rebut name calling, yet he used terms such as vigilante, hack job, and fabricated to describe Broderick and his work. He writes that "without all of the facts and objective criteria, someone cannot be fairly critiqued," yet he was obscuring both the facts and objectivity by posting his criticisms anonymously.
We enter into the public arena with a “thick skin” premise, however, open exchange can only be productive when no one is being called names and no one should have their integrity called into question every time a decision is made that someone doesn't like. Let’s face it; without all of the facts and objective criteria, someone cannot be fairly critiqued. Any useful information in Patrick’s Blog is lost because the facts have been twisted like a pretzel, thereby, rendering it a complete disservice to all who read it.
Before you think that I've somehow become conservative in my middle age--believe me the thought that I agree with Barbara Anderson on anything is enough to make me want to take a shower--let me explain. The problem with the bill isn't that it will get seniors to suddenly pass overrides, it's that the bill give tax breaks based not on a progressive idea of who can't afford to pay, but gives breaks to a particular group based only on demographics. The bill won't remove the fight over prop 2 1/2 overrides, it will just change the fight over who should pay.[L]awmakers are pushing a bill that would let cities and towns exempt seniors earning less than $60,000 a year from the overrides. Backers say the bill is a tax break for seniors, but critics say it's just a way to help push through property tax hikes.
On Thursday, House lawmakers overwhelmingly approved the bill, which now heads to the Senate....
[T]he new bill more explicitly links the tax breaks to the property tax override itself -- and that's irking longtime supporters of Proposition 2 1/2, who say the bill is just a way to entice many seniors to look the other way.
"Seniors are our first line of defense against overrides," said Barbara Anderson of the anti-tax group Citizens for Limited Taxation. Anderson helped lead the charge for the Proposition 2 1/2 law.
"Senior citizens are defeating these overrides and they are trying to give them a reason not to vote," she said.
No Drumlins Copyright © 2009 Premium Blogger Dashboard Designed by SAER