There is one significant problem with the article: no where does Nugent mention that she is also a member of the message board, having logged 59 posts at the site and posting a comment as recently as November 7.
Without commenting on the issue (OK, one small comment...while I do not condone the attacks I have read at that site, the prospect that someone would be investigated based on anonymous message board posts is chilling), there are a couple of questions that need to be answered:
- Did Karen Nugent inform her editors before reporting the story that she is a member of the site that is being investigated by the DA and the Attorney General?
- If not, did she have a duty to disclose that to her editors?
- If so, should her editors have kept her on the story, despite the appearance of a conflict of interest?
- And then, should they have included a disclaimer that the reporter was a member of the site being investigated?
Tags: Clinton Massachusetts Telegram and Gazette